Sunday, October 20, 2013

The Anarchy of the Rule of Opinion and Belief



In a democratic republic, such as the United States of America, the idea of democracy takes the form of representative government.  The people do not actually rule.  They do not directly create laws in any form.  Representatives are elected to localities, and those representatives create the laws.  Ideally, the people have agreed to follow those laws as they conduct their business and their lives.  This idea is known as the rule of law. 
Generally and specifically, the people and their representatives tacitly agree to not to break the laws their elected representatives have democratically voted on and enacted.  There is no suspension of these agreed upon laws short of blatant disobedience. The result can be the beginning of societal disorder, such as the partial shutdown of the government brought about by the House of Representatives stubborn refusal to legislate. Remember, writing, arguing for or against a bill, and then voting on it, is why, by law and by oath, they are there.
It does not matter what representatives or constituents believe.  If an enacted piece of legislation is personally disagreeable, then any representative is welcome to write new legislation to reverse it, if he can convince enough of his fellow representatives to go along with his new thinking.  Congressional rules preventing any part of this process obstruct the governmental process. This is the main exercise of democracy we use in Federal government.

If large political groups, religious, business, or just professional lobby groups, assert opinions that are contrary to Presidentially endorsed laws; that is their right.  Written or spoken opinions are protected by the First Amendment.  Nevertheless, politically aligned Congressional representatives cannot prevent the enforcement and enactment of those laws under any circumstances.  To allow governmental obstruction is to disrupt the rule of law and risk the fracture of the foundation of American society.